The Psychology of JonBenet Ramsey (Chap 6 - Final Word)
Added 2025-10-17 11:00:17 +0000 UTCDr Kirk Honda and Humberto Castaneda dive deep into the JonBenet Ramsey story.
00:00 Grand jury results
12:07 Linda Hoffman-Pugh's book
31:07 Who does Humberto & Dr. Kirk think was the perpetrator?
58:16 Why would parents abuse their children?
1:02:09 How does being falsely accused affect you?
1:07:28 Do psychologists assess suspects?
1:13:01 Are polygraphs legit?
1:24:31 Could more evidence have been found?
1:36:37 Final though
Become a member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOUZWV1DRtHtpP2H48S7iiw/join
Become a patron: https://www.patreon.com/PsychologyInSeattle
Email: https://www.psychologyinseattle.com/contact
Website: https://www.psychologyinseattle.com
Merch: https://psychologyinseattle-shop.fourthwall.com/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/psychologyinseattle/
Facebook Official Page: https://www.facebook.com/PsychologyInSeattle/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@kirk.honda
October 17, 2025
The Psychology In Seattle Podcast ®
Trigger Warning: This episode may include topics such as assault, trauma, and discrimination. If necessary, listeners are encouraged to refrain from listening and care for their safety and well-being.
Disclaimer: The content provided is for educational, informational, and entertainment purposes only. Nothing here constitutes personal or professional consultation, therapy, diagnosis, or creates a counselor-client relationship. Topics discussed may generate differing points of view. If you participate (by being a guest, submitting a question, or commenting) you must do so with the knowledge that we cannot control reactions or responses from others, which may not agree with you or feel unfair. Your participation on this site is at your own risk, accepting full responsibility for any liability or harm that may result. Anything you write here may be used for discussion or endorsement of the podcast. Opinions and views expressed by the host and guest hosts are personal views. Although, we take precautions and fact check, they should not be considered facts and the opinions may change. Opinions posted by participants (such as comments) are not those of the hosts. Readers should not rely on any information found here and should perform due diligence before taking any action. For a more extensive description of factors for you to consider, please see www.psychologyinseattle.com
Photo credit: By http://www.blogstodiefor.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/jonbenet-ramsey.jpg, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=32519685
Comments
I agree very strongly with this. If there was not a lot of blood and the fracture wasn’t apparent from the outside, whoever caused that injury couldn’t have known that it was fatal. I strongly suspect that she was killed deliberately, not accidentally. My hunch would be that it was an intruder who really intended to kidnap her but fumbled it somehow and decided killing her and fleeing would be the easiest way out.
Anna
2025-11-10 21:41:31 +0000 UTCSo she covered up her daughter’s accidental head injury… by strangling her to death with a rope? That seems very unlikely to me. But who knows.
Anna
2025-11-10 21:13:56 +0000 UTCThere’s a speculative angle I haven’t heard-so I’ll throw it out there (not that there needs to be anymore speculation). That Patsy was very drunk or on something the night of the party. This may explain either staying up all night or falling asleep in the same clothes the night before. Then something happened-it could have been completely accidental. Perhaps her daughter straight up fell down the stairs and severely injured herself, perhaps JonBenét and Burke got into a sibling fight and she fell-but her death was not intentional or abuse. Or, perhaps Patsy was being abusive and it got out of hand. Patsy felt she needed to cover it up to cover for her son or felt she’d be blamed for it or couldn’t remember what happened, or knew she was at fault. In a drunken or high stupor she concocted a haphazard cover up, thinking she’d have more time to sort things out the next day. Because the ransom note said she’d definitely die if they called the cops-she pretended to not read it and called the cops since she knew JonBenet was already dead. She chose the exact $ amount thinking she’d throw suspicion on someone close to John. John was in the dark, and if Burke was involved he was gaslighted or terrified to tell the truth (hence why he and John had never spoken about it) and Patsy took the secret to her grave. I think the element missing in all of this was that if one the Ramsey’s were severely impaired from alcohol or drugs from the Christmas party, then all of the absurd cover up details are explainable.
Maria J.
2025-10-29 00:54:31 +0000 UTCHere's my new theory that explains everything. There was an intruder, BUT the parents thought Burke was the perpetrator, so they began to cover up the crime. After a few days, they realized Burke was telling the truth, that it wasn't him. BUT it was too late. They found themselves trapped. Now they want to catch their daughter's killer, BUT their clumsy actions on the night of the murder essentially made it impossible. And that's the tragedy of this whole situation.
Gremlinzzz
2025-10-27 09:39:38 +0000 UTCThanks guys. This was super interesting. Great job.
Ed Wile
2025-10-23 14:10:36 +0000 UTCI really enjoyed listening to this series. I joined to listen to the extended version! I hope you guys do more of these on other topics
Kim Stewart
2025-10-21 17:21:38 +0000 UTCThank you for the incredible time you put into this Humberto! These deep dives are fascinating
Bunny Rosenberg
2025-10-21 05:54:51 +0000 UTCThanks for your comments on grief and 'odd' reactions, Dr. Honda. When a friend of mine died of suicide I really had no reaction for almost two years, when I went through a deep depression/grieving process and felt like it just happened. I'm sure it could have looked strange if someone was watching me closely. I try not to judge anyone's reaction to a traumatic event.
Madeline Moore
2025-10-21 03:22:12 +0000 UTCHere's a wild take: the Occam's Razer way of solving this. The easiest way for it to have happened, quickly, was in the home with no intruder. The easiest way for someone to write a ransom note with an exact monetary amount on it would be to already be very familiar with that specific amount. It's easier for an adult to kill a child, and would have been the easiest for John. And it's arguably easier to not move a body at all and try to pin it on another than make attempts to dispose of the body and risk being seen or other factors that could determine the culprit with evidence from tires, witnesses, etc. I know that's not the best way to solve a murder, but for my own sanity in this case, it's how I am putting it to rest in my mind. 😬
Simone Drucker
2025-10-19 16:30:08 +0000 UTCI am really impressed by Humberto’s ability to build the dramaturgy of the cases he has researched. The patience to hold the suspense, not give away clues to soon, to remember what was said when , etc… really really impressive. Thank you both for this format and I am looking forward to the next!
Julia
2025-10-18 15:53:26 +0000 UTCI 100% agree with Heather and Julie. If the intruder wanted to harm John through his family, he was tremendously successful. His beloved daughter is dead, his wife is vilified to this day, and poor Burke has been accused of murdering his sister his entire life. When John was interviewed by Ashley Flowers earlier this year, he said he had never discussed JonBenet’s murder with Burke. How sad is it that Burke had to grow up with an event so traumatic that his parents couldn’t talk about it with him - how can a family heal if there are things that can’t be said? Burke and his wife came to CrimeCon this year. I think this is the first time he has appeared at a public event with his family since he was a small child. I hope this is a sign that the family is healing. I really hope the intruder can be identified in their lifetimes.
Susan C Lester
2025-10-18 12:28:07 +0000 UTCIf the Ramsey's weren't involved, I feel awful for Jon. Losing a child in a car accident, having a child brutally murdered, watching your wife suffer and die young from cancer, being accused of horrific acts against your lost child for decades. Any one of those things could be unbearable.
Julie Rudmann
2025-10-18 10:18:31 +0000 UTCI would bet all $100 on an intruder is responsible. To me, the letter screams of grandiosity, someone who thinks they’re some mastermind from a movie. I read it as this is someone who feels power & control over JR. “Don’t try and grow a brain John” from the movie Speed. The power of being in the house for hours before & after the crime. It reads as someone with disordered thinking. Switching from “we are” to singular person. I know people want to believe it was the Ramseys. I just can’t buy into that theory. JonBenet had a 8 inch skull fracture. She was alive for 2-3 hours before being garroted. It is so heinous to think a parent would do that to cover up an accident. Further, using a garrote is a very specific type of crime. Not something everyday people think to use. Using it on a tiny child which an adult could easily use the strength of their hands says a lot about the perpetrator. I think the pineapple is a nothing burger. There was pineapple & cherries in her stomach, which was served at the party that night. The Ramseys didn’t do themselves any favors. They had tremendous privilege and acted entitled. Patsy was not likable and unfortunately continuing to do interviews made it worse for them. They talked about “we’ve hired the best experts” which gave an air of ‘we’re better than you.’ Whether that’s fair or not, they were still grieving parents. Any other parents would have been questioned immediately. Instead they were allowed to leave on a private jet and not interrogated for 4 months. Lastly, remember Elizabeth Smart? If her little sister hadn’t remembered the voice of the abductor as the guy who had worked on the house 1 time, months earlier she may have never been found. There were no prints or DNA left in that case. That’s just my 2 cents on the JonBenet case. I feel sorry for the family. I think they’ve been vilified enough.
Heather Campos
2025-10-18 03:21:30 +0000 UTCThoroughly enjoyed this series, great job dissecting all sides.
Jessica Giordano
2025-10-18 03:05:27 +0000 UTCUnlike Berto and Kirk, I would bet all $100 that it was an intruder. If a family member hit JonBenet on the head, she would have been alive, but unconscious. There would have been no marks on her body and no blood. From her appearance, she could have suffered a concussion and would have recovered. If the parents wanted to cover up for Burke, a more obvious way (and difficult to disprove) would be to call 911 and say she fell down the stairs or in the bathroom. I do not believe that two parents who were never documented to harm their children either before or after this event, would have assumed she was dead and strangled her to death with a rope. I can think of reasons why an intruder with a certain motive would have done all the things the intruder did - it could have been very deliberate. Thanks to Berto and Kirk for presenting both sides of the case - that is truly rare and is commendable.
Susan C Lester
2025-10-17 22:22:07 +0000 UTCDid Patsy really claim to have never read the note, because it sounds crazy suspicious! I would be reading it over and over, picking it apart for clues, trying to make sense out of it and asking the police questions. Now I’m definitely leaning towards RDI/BDI!
EtM
2025-10-17 21:55:04 +0000 UTCThe evidence in the JonBenét case was compromised right from the start. The crime scene wasn’t properly secured, people walked in and out, and key evidence ended up contaminated or lost. That made it nearly impossible to build a solid, objective case. About nine months later, there was a very similar incident in Boulder: a masked intruder attacked a 14-year-old girl who went to the same dance studio as JonBenét. Her mom scared him off, and he was never caught. That’s one of the reasons some investigators believe the intruder theory was never taken seriously enough. It’s hard to accept not knowing who did it but the truth is, we probably never will.
Nathalie
2025-10-17 21:12:32 +0000 UTCAwesome job, Berto! I can see why this case drives people crazy - any part of it can be argued to the ends of the Earth. Speaking of which, regarding the 2 sets of 2 red dots on Jonbenet's neck, it's been shown that the dots are the exact distance apart of the tracks of the train set that the brother got as a Christmas present (seen in some of the video of the day before.) The theory is that she may have fallen on a piece of the set or been hit by it. Which makes more sense than a possible taser without accompanying burns.
Julia Smith
2025-10-17 19:40:44 +0000 UTCAnd put the pen and rest of the pad back in the drawer from where they found it.
Julia Smith
2025-10-17 19:32:02 +0000 UTCI’ve always wondered if Burke gave JonBenet pineapple in the middle of the night. That could be why John and Patsy didn’t know about it, and why Burke reacted the way he did when asked about it. Maybe he was afraid he’d have gotten in trouble for sneaking out of bed.
Allison
2025-10-17 19:13:19 +0000 UTCEx-FBI profilers believe Burk threw the flashlight, accidentally killed her and they covered it up. I’m pretty much leaning that way, but there’s still so much towards IDI.
EtM
2025-10-17 17:53:19 +0000 UTCGreat job by Humberto on this series. Really enjoy having a layperson ask the questions that we’re wondering about.
Cynthia White
2025-10-17 16:04:19 +0000 UTCIt's totally plausible that an intruder got into the house and did it. It's hard to believe an intruder got into the house without leaving any trace, no witness, perfect timing, AND then leave a very weird note that he just had the time to do it on spot, AND forgot the first draft in the house.
Viqui
2025-10-17 15:59:13 +0000 UTCCan we say the evidence is flimsy/weak/speculative instead of circumstantial? There’s nothing inherently wrong with circumstantial evidence. Love the podcast, though! It just bugs me the way that “gaslighting” bugs Kirk.
Jenny Schumacher
2025-10-17 15:00:37 +0000 UTCGreat job! Berto does an incredible job on these🎉 Can I suggest Alex Murdaugh as your next deep dive. There is a Netflix documentary about him called the Murdaugh Murders. The story is fascinating and I would love to know what Dr. Honda thinks of his psychology.
Breasha Acquah
2025-10-17 14:36:46 +0000 UTCHer job could've been on the line. Did she wanna risk being fired?
Nikki Cornett
2025-10-17 14:22:56 +0000 UTCAs a former nanny and a now mom, I don't understand how the housekeeper could witness these discipline sessions and not call CPS if they were so bad that she'd believe Patsy would be at fault for the death.
Lizzy Myers
2025-10-17 13:58:34 +0000 UTCAmazing job Humberto. I was very young when this case happened and I remember the news (here in Chile at least) who reported on it were super biased towards the parents being the culprits. Thank you for a thorough review of the data, and a chance to challenge my own biases. Felicitaciones!! Espero que hagas más de estos deep dives!!
Carola Fuertes
2025-10-17 13:27:39 +0000 UTC
