Malpractice Claim (Bob's First Episode) (2016 Rerun)
Added 2025-01-16 12:00:10 +0000 UTC[Rerun} Dr. Kirk Honda talks with Bob Goettle about a malpractice claim.
Become a member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOUZWV1DRtHtpP2H48S7iiw/join
Become a patron: https://www.patreon.com/PsychologyInSeattle
Email: https://www.psychologyinseattle.com/contact
Website: https://www.psychologyinseattle.com
Merch: https://teespring.com/stores/psychology-in-seattle
KIRKgram (like Cameo): https://www.psychologyinseattle.com/kirkgram
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/psychologyinseattle/
Facebook Official Page: https://www.facebook.com/PsychologyInSeattle/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@kirk.honda
August 3, 2016
The Psychology In Seattle Podcast ®
Trigger Warning: This episode may include topics such as assault, trauma, and discrimination. If necessary, listeners are encouraged to refrain from listening and care for their safety and well-being.
Disclaimer: The content provided is for educational, informational, and entertainment purposes only. Nothing here constitutes personal or professional consultation, therapy, diagnosis, or creates a counselor-client relationship. Topics discussed may generate differing points of view. If you participate (by being a guest, submitting a question, or commenting) you must do so with the knowledge that we cannot control reactions or responses from others, which may not agree with you or feel unfair. Your participation on this site is at your own risk, accepting full responsibility for any liability or harm that may result. Anything you write here may be used for discussion or endorsement of the podcast. Opinions and views expressed by the host and guest hosts are personal views. Although, we take precautions and fact check, they should not be considered facts and the opinions may change. Opinions posted by participants (such as comments) are not those of the hosts. Readers should not rely on any information found here and should perform due diligence before taking any action. For a more extensive description of factors for you to consider, please see www.psychologyinseattle.com
Comments
Personally, I don't think I could ethically feel right asking a client not to go to a particular 12 step meeting, particularly if they're in early recovery. Typically, they don't have easy access to transportation, so their options are more limited. I would be more established with my recovery community, so I could easily take a break from my usual meeting and it wouldn't be a big deal, because newcomers tend to shop around quite a bit anyway (of course, this does depend on the size of the community you live in). I would make the ethical conundrum known first, then offer for me to find another meeting if needed.
Waylon Waddell
2025-01-21 20:19:14 +0000 UTCThe funniest part of this was when Bob said that he didn't think he had anything worth while to say. Glad you changed your mind about that!
Caitlin House
2025-01-16 17:37:18 +0000 UTC
