TToB: Unlike other addictions, marijuana addiction does not seem to be linked to DNA. Tough or Bluff???
Added 2024-05-28 12:00:05 +0000 UTCComments
It’s BLUFF! Researchers analyzed data from one million people and found that sections of DNA are linked with marijuana addiction. (DOI: 10.1038/s41588-023-01563-z)
Psychology In Seattle
2024-05-29 06:07:40 +0000 UTC"linked to DNA" meaning having genetic risk factors? On some level there must be... Even if we haven't found a link yet.
Stephen Woo
2024-05-28 23:08:28 +0000 UTCI'm very interested to see whether this is tough or if it is bluff.
Anna × LacedUpTight
2024-05-28 20:33:44 +0000 UTCTough? It's not addictive in the same way as other drugs, is it? That's my experience, anyway
Louise
2024-05-28 18:37:38 +0000 UTCTough = true, bluff = false
Doris
2024-05-28 16:18:32 +0000 UTCTough
Erica Fox
2024-05-28 15:37:00 +0000 UTCI'm new: what does tough vs. bluff indicate?
Holly DB
2024-05-28 15:36:18 +0000 UTCill go with a blough
D H
2024-05-28 13:36:27 +0000 UTCSeems like addiction is genetic as a behavior. The chemical isn’t.
Cat Sanctuary Dallas
2024-05-28 12:54:45 +0000 UTCI think bluff because I would guess there are genes associated to a general sensitivity to get hooked and addicted to stuff.
Laurence Provost
2024-05-28 12:08:55 +0000 UTCI'm saying tough bc endocanabinoids. That's all I got
Moon Woman Studios
2024-05-28 12:05:25 +0000 UTC
