Using denoising to reduce samples and rendering time
Added 2023-10-28 14:03:49 +0000 UTCI wanted to see if I could reduce rendering time by decreasing the number of samples. From what I see, I do not think there is any real difference between 500 samples denoised and 2000 samples denoised. Even zooming in at 200% does not seem to impact the quality.
What do you all think?
Comments
Very valid point. I think what I will do is if I can time things so I am trickling scenes here and there, I can keep the samples high. I did purchase the render doctor, which allows me to queue up renders overnight. Saved me a lot of time.
Sanguineangie Productions (member)
2023-11-01 03:30:53 +0000 UTCAlthough 2000 samples is noticeably better In the image here, you can get away with lower samples with denoising if it saves you a lot of rendering time. When you are doing a close up of a face however, it's best to use a higher number of samples with no denoising to preserve as much of the detail in the skin and eyes as possible. This is just my opinion though.
Bobbyboy Productions
2023-10-28 14:15:09 +0000 UTCYeah I can't tell the difference either
Mahesvara
2023-10-28 14:09:40 +0000 UTC
