Amanda Montell Interview *Early Release*
Added 2021-06-21 03:11:37 +0000 UTCHi guys,
We are releasing the Amanda Montell interview early for Patreons.
It won't be out on the main feed for a few weeks but it should be in the Bonus 'Galaxy Brain' feed now. If you haven't got access to that feed yet just drop us a message or use this link: patreon.com/rss/DecodingTheGurus?auth=g2O6nEppM4VAwGvPuFYPr5PcqCrzVX-8
Amanda has a wealth of knowledge on linguistics, gurus, and cult dynamics. We found her extremely insightful and hope you do too!
There were some Zoom artefacts we could not remove from the recording but if you find any other issues, let us know and we will correct before we release to the main feed.
Thanks!
Chris
Comments
Ah dear! Send us DM with email address and we will send personal link.
Christopher Kavanagh
2021-06-26 05:10:53 +0000 UTCFor some reason, that link doesnโt work for me. Iโve tried both clicking it and copying and pasting into the podcast app.
DavidtheG
2021-06-25 16:23:58 +0000 UTCLoved this episode. As soon as it finished i immediately purchased 'cultish' from audible!
Emma
2021-06-25 10:22:15 +0000 UTCGood points!!!
Christopher Kavanagh
2021-06-23 14:37:26 +0000 UTCGreat ep. Just on the language/metaphor thing. It may seem pedantic, but Brett's "like playing Russian Roulette with a loaded gun", really gets my goat. You can't play Russian Roulette with an UNloaded gun. By definition, if you're playing Russian Roulette, the gun is loaded. Adding "...with a LOADED GUN" on the end of the sentence is a logical redundancy (if not even fallacious, in the implication that there's any other way). The only reason for adding it, is as an emotional intensifier. Which is symptomatic of the whole discursive style. Brett and Heather present their dialogue as being in a scientific, rationalist mode, and then proceed to use every emotional manipulation trick in the book. But with judicious use of certain stock phrases and weasel words, still manage to convince their audience that they're still in the presented mode. It's irritating.
Paul Bowman
2021-06-23 13:34:14 +0000 UTCTotally. They make my skin crawl when used to dodge scrutiny or influence people through the power of suggestion.
Carolyn Reeves
2021-06-22 01:03:26 +0000 UTCI agree with you and Amanda that good metaphors are often extremely useful but itโs just notable how often the gurus we look at rely on them and end up often fixating on them. Bret didnโt chose a Russian Roulette metaphor for vaccines by random and Jordan Petersonโs entire philosophy practically hinges on indulgent metaphors.
Christopher Kavanagh
2021-06-22 00:28:36 +0000 UTCThanks for this! I found the conversation around metaphor intriguing. Metaphor (and any language tool that emphasizes a concept or meaning via extrapolation/ contextual reframing) helps me a lot in terms of general grokking- and Iโve (anecdotally) heard that this is the case for certain neurotypes. Iโll sometimes use metaphor to help two people understand each other when doing mediation work. So, I think itโs powerful- not just as a literary device, but as a communication and comprehension tool. But, as you discussed with Amanda, metaphors can certainly be used irresponsibly. The vagueness, the blurred edges, the lack of precision and room for interpretation makes metaphor a useful tool for those bad gurus. I canโt see myself disavowing metaphor, but I will be extra vigilant of ethical integrity around those porous borders of meaning. Thanks for bringing my attention to the importance ofโฆ using metaphors responsibly? Gotta weed out those sprouts of guru tendency ๐ฑ๐
Carolyn Reeves
2021-06-21 16:05:41 +0000 UTC
