Question
Added 2020-09-19 16:11:40 +0000 UTCIf i don't confirm if a picture is of me or not is it technically a picture of me?
Comments
As I see it, if the picture is actually of you, the fact remains that it is of you, regardless of if you confirm it. However, not being able to be identified does give you plausible deniability. But thats not what really turns you on. You want to be exposed, don't you slut? :) (on a small scale, of course)
Ferris Beuller
2020-09-19 23:17:10 +0000 UTCOr to avoid the quantum physics question -- post a picture and confirm...make your fans happy!
D
2020-09-19 17:21:35 +0000 UTCIt both is and isn't. Schrödinger's Slut. :)
Robert
2020-09-19 16:43:32 +0000 UTCMore science then! 😉
Mike
2020-09-19 16:38:45 +0000 UTCI won't assume its you unless you say it is confirming it. I would think its a stock photo if there isn't a caption under it saying who it is. There is a 3rd option where your trying to make us guess to see if it you or not, but thats a playful tease 😉
Dave ACY
2020-09-19 16:31:06 +0000 UTCwho says i haven't already this morning
Maggie Hill
2020-09-19 16:30:29 +0000 UTCMaybe we need more in order to test the theory. That’s SCIENCE. 😆
Mike
2020-09-19 16:29:57 +0000 UTCYes because you're neither confirming or denying it lol
Cody Ginnel
2020-09-19 16:24:05 +0000 UTCso it's both me and not me at the same time?
Maggie Hill
2020-09-19 16:23:32 +0000 UTCBut it could still be you
Cody Ginnel
2020-09-19 16:22:25 +0000 UTCbut if you can't tell who it is, it may not be me
Maggie Hill
2020-09-19 16:21:19 +0000 UTCIf it's you then yes lol
Cody Ginnel
2020-09-19 16:19:49 +0000 UTC
