Crash A5 Binder
Added 2020-11-02 13:18:35 +0000 UTCThe sample has come back - thinking of just having the logo on the cover at the moment. What do you think?
Comments
Will this binder be available to purchase?
Peter Simpson
2020-11-23 12:02:22 +0000 UTCLogo only will be good )
Paul Robertson
2020-11-15 19:31:41 +0000 UTCLooks lovely, though I agree with everyone who said the Software Review isn't needed. Gave me a twinge of nostalgia, though!
Tim Wright
2020-11-05 12:45:02 +0000 UTCAgree with Steven and Joao. Logo only.
Rob Davies
2020-11-05 10:24:51 +0000 UTCWhy use cordex and not wirex? If that's an option, of course.. it would allow us to insert as many (or as few) issues can fit in a binder, and not be restricted by the number of cords. I've been looking at buying some A4 binders from modernbookbinders.com, as it seems that I missed the Crash A4 binder when they were still offered. Speaking of which, any plans to restock A4 binders? As to these A5 binders. "Quarterly software review" makes no sense, nor does "Software Review" just by itself. I'd prefer the logo only on the front. As to the spine, can you maybe have it larger? The ratio between the graphics and the spine size are strange..
JoΓ£o Ventura
2020-11-04 12:30:21 +0000 UTCI'd concur with the others and stick with the logos only (not software review)
Steven Innell
2020-11-04 01:01:46 +0000 UTCPresumably it won't JUST be software reviews, so having Software Review on the binder doesn't make sense to me. +1 Logo only crew.
Michael Kennedy
2020-11-03 10:52:29 +0000 UTCLooks Great π
Lee Chops Stevenson
2020-11-03 08:46:43 +0000 UTCI don't mind the extra words...feels quite 80s to me
Chris King
2020-11-03 07:49:03 +0000 UTCjust logo on cover, spine like original
MK
2020-11-03 06:27:27 +0000 UTCAgreed logo only
Andy Smallbone
2020-11-02 22:54:59 +0000 UTCYep, just the logo.
Bastiaan van Hamersveld
2020-11-02 21:04:23 +0000 UTCI like the way you are trying to recreate the old style binder- why not put βMonthly Software Reviewβ on it like that. I also like the logo on the side. Looking good!
Bill Tyler
2020-11-02 21:02:33 +0000 UTCYep just the logo
John McDermott
2020-11-02 18:52:31 +0000 UTCLogo only...
Swingofthings .
2020-11-02 18:50:24 +0000 UTCLogo on cover and the spine - nothing else needed.
Gwdaley
2020-11-02 18:24:44 +0000 UTCLogo on its own looks the best to me.
cathers
2020-11-02 18:17:13 +0000 UTCYup, Logo for me too. Looks great.
Piers Saunders
2020-11-02 17:26:49 +0000 UTCLogo alone works for me.
Dave Isherwood
2020-11-02 15:57:36 +0000 UTCLooks classy. It's a go from me!
Gemma Reidie
2020-11-02 15:41:07 +0000 UTCI agree, keep it clean with just the Crash logo and nothing else.
Michael Kirk
2020-11-02 15:27:10 +0000 UTCHave to agree with others! The logo is GO. If anything else was to be on it, maybe "FUSION" could go somewhere.
martin willmott
2020-11-02 14:12:45 +0000 UTC+1 on the "just the logo please" side of voting
Michiel Bijlsma
2020-11-02 14:11:43 +0000 UTCJust logo... Yep
Boaz Halachmi
2020-11-02 14:09:28 +0000 UTCWe all seem to be agreed: logo only for the front. It's all that's needed. If there were some sort of special edition version βΒ a binder for some related product βΒ then some extra text might well be appropriate to distinguish that from the normal. But otherwise, no further 'explanatory' text is needed. Moreover, Crash is about more than just software reviews, so putting "Software Review" on the front both restricts the scope and makes the description inaccurate. Leave it off! :-)
Richard Hallas
2020-11-02 14:08:17 +0000 UTCJust the logo and centred gets my vote.
Mark Phillips
2020-11-02 14:08:13 +0000 UTCJust the plain logo on the front and side IMO
Mark Stephens
2020-11-02 14:06:55 +0000 UTCjust logo only on the front, i like the idea of something on the side even if its just the logo, as the binders would be sitting side on when sitting on a shelf.
Rob Dean
2020-11-02 14:01:54 +0000 UTCYeah, I'd go for just the logo too π
Paul Davies
2020-11-02 13:58:14 +0000 UTC+1 for logo only.
Ian Thompson
2020-11-02 13:48:52 +0000 UTCLooks great! I agree with the other comments regarding the software review text.. personally, I'd go with just the Crash logo.
Steve Dietz
2020-11-02 13:46:44 +0000 UTCI agree that "software review" on the front cover does distract you from the logo above. Not sure if it is needed on the spine either, as shown under your hand, but happy either way.
John Russell
2020-11-02 13:38:00 +0000 UTCLooks great but, as others have said, just keep the logo!
Rich Thomas
2020-11-02 13:33:00 +0000 UTCI agree remove software review but otherwise looks great
Paul Ledson
2020-11-02 13:30:41 +0000 UTCLooks good but I agree to take away the Software Review text, not needed
Michael Winn
2020-11-02 13:30:15 +0000 UTCJust the logo on the front would. be enough.
RetroGuyBry
2020-11-02 13:29:58 +0000 UTCAh this brings back some fantastic memories. Having text below the logo would be truer to the original (properly aligned without the extended underline)
Chris
2020-11-02 13:24:29 +0000 UTCI agree, remove the software review and put the Crash logo on the side but without the other lines, although hard to see in the pic
I-0-I 'Paul Sumner'
2020-11-02 13:23:14 +0000 UTCHi, just the logo without "Software Review" would be my preference
Sean Meeson
2020-11-02 13:21:30 +0000 UTCLooks good! But yes take away the "software review bit" doesn't look right
Nicholas Hooker
2020-11-02 13:21:01 +0000 UTCJust saw the pic of the side - great!
Howard Knibbs
2020-11-02 13:20:50 +0000 UTCWill there be something on the side too?
Howard Knibbs
2020-11-02 13:20:12 +0000 UTCThis looks lovely!
Howard Knibbs
2020-11-02 13:19:37 +0000 UTC
