SakeTami
citationsneededpodcast
citationsneededpodcast

patreon


Episode 221: Anti-Science Mugging on the Right and the Ascent of American Anti-Intellectualism

“Jaw Clench Study Takes Tax Dollars,” United Press International cautioned in 1975. “‘Shrimp On A Treadmill’: Rand Paul Mocks National Science Foundation Studies,” Forbes reported in 2021. “Gov't waste report finds $400K spent to give lonely rats cocaine: 'Absurd',” Fox News told viewers in 2024. 

According to these headlines, a wasteful, woke liberal government has been squandering taxpayer money on something wholly undeserving: frivolous scientific studies. Tens of thousands to millions of dollars, we’re told, are being handed out like candy so scientists can sit around watching monkeys clench their jaws, putting shrimp on treadmills, and give cocaine to rats. And who gets to choose which studies are funded? Wasteful ultra woke organizations like the National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, and Health and Human Services. 

It’s true that some research doesn’t end up having much practical relevance––indeed this is the nature of scientific inquiry! There are sometimes cul-de-sacs and wrong paths. But the majority of the time, studies that are trivialized in media and on the Senate floor aren’t superfluous at all. 

While soundbites like “shrimp on a treadmill” might paint a ridiculous picture, they’re also taken out of context, obscuring the scientific merit and moral import of the research and researchers, who work for years on often obscure, tedious lines of inquiry only to have their lives’ work reduced to a cheap punchline by bad-faith demagogues playing to the public’s ignorance and lizard brain impulses. 

So, why is this media and political punchline so popular? And what’s the agenda of the lawmakers and media organizations that denigrate and misrepresent research and science more broadly, and the larger current of conspicuous anti-intellectualism that has always been present in American political culture, but in the last ten years has entirely taken over the modern American Right? 

On this episode, we discuss the decades-old, anti-intellectual gambit of mocking and attacking the “frivolous study,” examining how it warps and devalues science and international cooperation in a broader effort to defund public institutions, both scientific and otherwise.

Our guest is Brenda Ekwurzel, Senior Director of Scientific Excellence at the Union of Concerned Scientists.

*

Guest

Brenda Ekwurzel is Senior Director of Scientific Excellence at the Union of Concerned Scientists. A climatologist, geologist, geochemist and hydrologist, Dr. Ekwurzel has shared her expertise on climate science across a wide range of research and media, from ABC News to NPR, the New York Times to the Washington Post.

**

Show Notes

Attacks on Science

March 2025 | Union of Concerned Scientists

The Golden Fleece: Anti-intellectualism and social science

Leigh Shaffer | 1977| American Psychologist

'Shrimp On A Treadmill': The Politics Of 'Silly' Studies

Nell Greenfieldboyce | August 23, 2011 | NPR Morning Edition

The State of Science at 100 Days: Co-Opted, Hindered, and Undermined

Jules Barbati-Dajches | May 8, 2025 | The Equation

Trump team freezes new NSF awards — and could soon axe hundreds of grants

Dan Garisto | April 17, 2025 | Nature

A Backward March: Another Month of Attacks on Federal Science

Jules Barbati-Dajches | April 2, 2025 | The Equation

A Hundred Attacks and Counting: What Happened to Federal Science in February

Jules Barbati-Dajches | March 12, 2025 | The Equation

Fact Check: ‘Shrimp on a treadmill’ study and cost misrepresented

Reuters Fact Check | February 21, 2025 | Reuters

Musk and Ramaswamy’s DOGE Strategy: Bully Federal Scientists

Karen Perry Stillerman | January 15, 2025 | The Equation

The rise of Ozempic: how surprise discoveries and lizard venom led to a new class of weight-loss drugs

Sebastian Furness | April 2, 2024 | University of Queensland

NIH scientists identify new brain mechanism involved in impulsive cocaine-seeking in rats

June 28, 2022 | National Institutes of Health

Richard Hofstadter and America’s New Wave of Anti-Intellectualism

David Masciotra | March 9, 2014 | The Daily Beast

From Anti-Government to Anti-Science: Why Conservatives Have Turned Against Science

Naomi Oreskes & Erik M. Conway | November 15, 2022 | Daedalus

New Book Examines Effects of Anti-intellectual Thought on Science

Michael Saunders | September 20, 2024 | BU School of Public Health

The Antiscience Movement Is Escalating, Going Global and Killing Thousands

Peter J. Hotez | March 29, 2021 | Scientific American

How Trump’s attack on universities is putting research in peril

Dan Garisto, Jeff Tollefson & Alexandra Witze | April 24, 2025 | Nature

A climate scientist questioned his findings. It didn’t go well.

Stephanie Hanes | June 10, 2024 | Christian Science Monitor

Michael Mann beat his defamers. But climate scientists are still under attack.

Lauren Kurtz | February 28, 2024 | Yale Climate Connections

Her work paved the way for blockbuster obesity drugs. Now, she’s fighting for recognition

Jennifer Couzin-Frankel | September 8, 2023 | Science

Why isn’t the right more afraid of COVID-19?

Christina Pazzanese | October 30, 2020 | The Harvard Gazette

Many Americans deeply distrust experts. So will they ignore the warnings about coronavirus?

Eric Merkley | March 19, 2020 | The Washington Post

Trump Administration’s Attacks on Science Already Surpass Two Bush Terms

Elliott Negin | August 16, 2019 | Truthout

The truth about Galileo and his conflict with the Catholic Church

Jessica Wolf | December 22, 2016 | UCLA Newsroom

Attacks on federal research funding anger scientists

Ben Goldfarb | February 3, 2015 | High Country News

Battle between NSF and House science committee escalates: How did it get this bad?

Jeffrey Mervis | October 2, 2014 | Science

Silencing the Scientists: the Rise of Right-wing Populism

Clive Hamilton | March 2, 2011 | Our World

Adlai Stevenson, the original egghead

Kimberly French | November 3, 2008 | UUWorld

All That’s Gold Does Not Glitter

Etienne S. Benson | June 1, 2006 | Association for Pyschological Science

Proxmire's booby prize; Does the Golden Fleece have a silver lining?

Laura van Dam | August 5, 1982 | Christian Science Monitor

***

Transcript

For a full transcript of this episode, go here. You can also find transcripts of past episodes, live shows, Beg-a-Thons, Interviews and News Briefs here.

****

Citations Merch

Summer swag is the best, so remember that the Citations Needed merch store is open! Please consider further supporting the show by picking up a t-shirt, tank top, hoodie, tote, water bottle or mug for yourself or your favorite Citations fan (or everyone you know!).

*****

Credits

Senior Producer: Florence Barrau-Adams

Producer: Julianne Tveten

Production Assistant: Trendel Lightburn

Newsletter: Marco Cartolano

Music: Grandaddy

*******

Episode 221: Anti-Science Mugging on the Right and the Ascent of American Anti-Intellectualism

Comments

Finding out that they've been homophobic towards frogs for like 50 years now :( Real talk though, fantastic episode + guest. Fascinating to know where these studies actually lead! And infuriating to see how credulous media can be picking up on these "concerns." The tirade beginning at 10:00 or so gives the whole game away when it makes fun of rural road construction studies in Poland. All of the studies are important, obviously, but how is that one in particular not inherently relevant to the US??? Just shows how false the "just a concerned everyday American taxpayer" persona is. (Or maybe it's also a case of assuming anyone outside the US has NOTHING worthwhile to show us.) Sorry, long rant. Good episode. I remember that AARP shrimp commercial very clearly 🫤

ellie

I got so much verbal ammo from this episode - also why are Americans such know it alls? I mean really - I’m probably a huge know it all too 😂

HenrytheWorst


More Creators