Is there any point in liquid animation?
Added 2020-08-13 15:26:26 +0000 UTCI can discard it in favor of more elaborate, but static liquids.
Basically, I used the simulation because I didn't know how to create objects of the fluid manually, but now I can. (example)
It takes ~24 hours to create a single 5sec animation from a single camera (more than half of the time is waiting for the simulation), and ~24 hours for rendering.
There will be no animation of sex in any case. In DAZ, a lot of time is wasted, the software works very poorly with animation.
P.S. New Set 32/100 images.
Comments
In that case, stick to the animations for the deflations (please).
IBT
2020-08-14 05:13:27 +0000 UTCI say only talking about deflating a cum inflated belly
Hold
2020-08-14 04:32:48 +0000 UTCTo be clearer about what I mean by that ... If you're talking about deflating a cum inflated belly, then simple liquid animated is ideal. If you're talking about spattering the outside of a girl with cum, then a static but high quality liquid still image works just fine.
IBT
2020-08-14 04:23:50 +0000 UTCThe real answer kind of depends on the context.
IBT
2020-08-14 02:55:21 +0000 UTCI will look at the results of the poll, if someone is interested, then I can continue to make them further, but if they are not particularly needed, then there is no point in wasting time on this. "Dripping creams" will be, but as images (approximately as at nothingmore3d), if the poll results are for the first option.
Hold
2020-08-13 15:55:09 +0000 UTCStill, dripping creampie like in elf slaves and galactic limit are incredible... :). This is something different than other artist and its so cool!!!!
Speed
2020-08-13 15:51:01 +0000 UTC
