Technical Criticism Poll
Added 2023-04-17 19:05:05 +0000 UTCHey all!
I wanted to start up a poll this week to get your feedback on what technical aspects of my scenes are lacking/need serious work. When watching one of my recent scenes (Harley, Aunt Cass, DVa, and/or Chun-Li), what jumps out that you wish was done better on a technical standpoint?
As I start working on Elizabeth's big scene, I want to know which aspects need more love. I really appreciated your feedback with last week's storyline synopsis, and I look forward to hearing your feedback regarding this topic. If you don't see a choice that best describes a flaw with my content, please make a comment on this post.
Please review the poll below and choose the technical aspect(s) you desire to see more improvement on. The only way I'll improve as an animator is to know what to improve on from an audience who has no reason to hold back criticism. Fire away, folks!
Comments
Dialog.story.loved the hieroglyphics story while exploring maybe a part 2.a 3rd and a 4th to add on to "oh no.not again."while reusing some of or all of the original voices.
2023-04-18 20:23:20 +0000 UTCLighting.my opinion is bright is good but maybe try to work the Lighting from a glowing hugger that gets brighter the closer it reaches its goal in the hole.then track the glowing/bright eggs through the body.making the skin glow or produces warmth in her belly while in a dark hive/cave
2023-04-18 20:12:17 +0000 UTCFirstly,thanks to the endless commitment that goes into kg facehuggers.most appreciated and enjoying the work.
2023-04-18 20:03:43 +0000 UTCThank you for your feedback, Patrick. I do make efforts to show faster torso movement when she's about to climax (almost rollercoaster-like). Perhaps I could also experiment with "squirming", eye-closing, fast hand gripping, or feet curling as additional signs that she's getting close.
KGFacehuggers
2023-04-18 14:59:16 +0000 UTCThanks
Kar1Ma7x 1
2023-04-18 14:55:41 +0000 UTC^ Nailed it. It's widely regarded as one of the biggest nosedives in television history. "Bad writing" is synonymous with GoT Season 8. As for how it relates to my stuff, pop culture references can be tied to anything and everything.
KGFacehuggers
2023-04-18 14:54:11 +0000 UTCIt does. That was the joke. The link is the plot of the scenes and dialogue.
Darth_Rondoudou
2023-04-18 05:54:19 +0000 UTCmore body movement not just boobs but when they orgasm they could have more interaction i guess is what im going for
Subply
2023-04-18 03:24:28 +0000 UTCI struggled with choosing one (ultimately landing on wanting more sticky liquid) but yes, facial expression when the woman orgasms could be improved (or focused on more). I actually appreciate that your videos ARE NOT so dark as most others' videos where one struggles to actually see anything, and boob movement is pretty good in most of yours.
SirRender
2023-04-18 00:57:11 +0000 UTCThe only thing that jumps out to me is that when the women orgasm there is not much change in expression or actions.
Patrick McCaffrey
2023-04-17 23:03:51 +0000 UTCI don't get the joke in the second one. Does GoT season 8 have bad writing or something? And how is that related to your stuff, KG?
Kar1Ma7x 1
2023-04-17 21:44:58 +0000 UTCMore boob penetration
Sub-Zero
2023-04-17 21:02:36 +0000 UTCClipping. Ahh. That would've been a good poll option. Yeah, Harley's hair was a nightmare to animate. Because of the blockyness of her "wax-like" hair, collisions with her body would make her hair physics jolt around like she was zapped by a cattle prod. The only timely fix was to let some of the hair bones clip within reason. Thank you for your feedback, Derek.
KGFacehuggers
2023-04-17 19:22:54 +0000 UTCNot sure of what this would fall under but I noticed on the Quinn animation, her hair was moving in and, even, through her shoulders. That was very unnatural looking.
Derek Reaves
2023-04-17 19:09:28 +0000 UTC
