100% REALISM VS 'FUTANARI' and The Tipping Point
Added 2025-09-07 18:39:38 +0000 UTCHi all, I've created a few sets that will complete and release over the next ~45 days that are new stable diffusion models I'm trying out for the first time. As a result, the 'futa' in the images look far more like photo-real 'trans' persons whom may actually exist. I need your honest feedback on what you're interested in seeing and whether this type of content is something you want, along with the continued 'futa' types like Katarina, Ashe, and Laura Craught. Specifically the Leather Couch series and Summer Poolside series....
Comment away please!
PS - I define FUTA as clearly female, but with a phallus, any size(small medium large huge), and clearly not an entity that would ever exist in reality. (Mostly distinctly not a trans person).
Trans - A real type of person
Comments
The model from High Heels and Waterfalls is the kind of content I want to see. Only in futa. I love the tight bods with abs and big stripper tits.
Riley078
2025-09-08 13:46:56 +0000 UTCMy honest opinion. Here we go. For me this whole ai generated projects are about the search for the perfect woman. The idealised woman. For me futa is a kink and I don't know what is considered canon but for me is woman with male genitalia. In my opinion Maxine and Amelia were the peak sets for far. Since then we somehow went towards over filtered Instagram 'models' with the dark elves or ashe or the sorority. (They look like they were made from vax or were spray with a lot of bronzers) The less fakery would be more preferable. For me the 80s and 90s playboy models were favourites. Or early industry Jenna Jameson. The small town girl. The naive beauty. Maybe you people know the meme : million dollar (Hollywood) model Vs random Starbuck's waitress. (Although Sydney Sweeney is a babe) P.s.: I almost forgot. The Swedish models set was also close to peak. It was believable.
Nekrosz
2025-09-08 06:29:37 +0000 UTC
