SakeTami
Rereading Wolfe
Rereading Wolfe

patreon


James Wynn's False Thecla Theory

"My bed seemed to toss beneath me. I gripped the sides and sat up and it was still, but as soon as my head touched the pillow once more the swaying began again. I felt I was wide awake - then that I was awake again but had been sleeping only a moment before. I was conscious that someone was in the tiny cabin with me, and for some reason I could not have explained I thought it was the young woman who had taken the part of our patroness.
“I sat up in the tossing bed. Dim light filtered beneath the door; there was no one there. When I lay down again, the room was filled with Thecla's perfume. The false Thecla from the House Azure had come, then.I got out of bed, and nearly falling opened the door. There was no one in the passage outside.” - Chapter 11, The Feast, The Shadow of the Torturer

This event occurs in Severian’s new cell, after his elevation to journeyman. I think there is an explanation for this event that ties in with Severian’s conversation with False Thecla and also aligns with Chapter 1:1’s allusion to the first chapter of Great Expectations.

These are my priors:

“She had narrow, very white teeth in a wide mouth.” (chapter 7, The Shadow of the Torturer)
“He sat at the edge of the bed, cleaning sparse and surprisingly small teeth with one great finger.”
(chapter 15, The Shadow of the Torturer)

There is no consensus on any of these points. But each is key to my explanation.

What I think is implied here is that the exultants are a line of clones – as was Typhon who was among the earliest of the exultant class. 

He says “No, I was not born as I am, or born at all, as you meant it.” It seems that clone engendering was still rare enough on Urth in Typhon’s time that he considers it worth remarking on.

When the new exultant generation is cloned, they are cloned in pairs. One is randomly chosen to be the exultant and the other will be the khaibit. False Thecla says

"I was saying that the Chatelaine Thecla is not the Chatelaine Thecla. Not the Chatelaine Thecla of your mind, which is the only Chatelaine Thecla you care about. Neither am I. What, then, is the difference between us?", chapter 9, The Shadow of the Torturer

False Thecla is making a broader point but it is based on a real fact that is perhaps only commonly known among the exultant class itself: That the khaibits are genetically identical to their twins and had as much chance of being the exultant -- with the greatest of privileges and wealth in the Commonweath -- as being a mere accessory to an exultant with zero legal status as a person at all. And this status is why the Autarch can employ them as prostitutes. Their legal status is the same as that of Ern Smithe in “A Borrowed Man.”

So the answer to the apparent association Severian makes between the Maid and False Thecla is that the Maid (who went by the name Catherine – The Cla = Ca The ine) had been the khaibit of Thecla’s mother. Thecla, False Thecla, Thecla’s mother, and Catherine were all genetically identical.  Much speculation has been made over whether Thecla is Severian’s mother or his sister. In fact, she is both – in a way. Thea is Thecla’s “half-sister” in that they are of the clone lines of a pair of sister who knows how many generations back.

The Maid – Catherine – Severian’s mother – was granted the opportunity to see Severian grow up before her death by participating in his elevation ceremony each year – once a year for Severian but all in one day for Catherine. When Severian senses that the Maid has been in his room, she has. When he deduces from her scent that False Thecla has been in his room, she has: Thecla, False Thecla, Catherine, they all use the same perfume – burning rose. They are, in a sense, the same person.

This gets us closer to the mystery of “Whose body was being exhumed in Chapter 1 of “Shadow”? In the first Chapter of “Great Expectations” Pip stands before the grave of his mother and is quickly induced into league with a criminal. The implication from this allusion is that the woman being exhumed is Severian’s mother. But as we can see, there are many ways a person can be Severian’s mother – or his sister.

** Footnote: 
1 Some might argue that if this theory true, then Severian ought to have recognized False Thecla in the maid's face. However, it seems likely that False Thecla was significantly older than the maid's (20-22yrs vs 14-16yrs).
2 After the feast, Severian also records, “What became of the maid I do not know. She disappeared as she has each Katharine's Day I can remember. I have not seen her again.” 
This is the most solid refutation against the maid being Severian’s mother at all. As Severian writes this, as Autarch he WOULD 100% know what became of that maid if she were his mother - - and every detail of his mother's death and execution.
This also refutes my assertion that the Autarch ate her after her death: In his mind (at this writing) would be the memories of himself each Katherine’s Day.
Accepting this claim as written, refutes that the False Thecla is the maid and certainly that his mother was in the Autarch. And it also refutes that the maid is Severian's mother.
I appreciate this argument if you choose to make it, but I find it difficult to treat this claim with the weight I would normally give it.
Whether Catherine is IN the Autarch? That is neither here nor there.  But if the maid was not Severian’s mother, this entire theory is trash.

Comments

Okay San Pedro, I understand how this works. It works fine as long as it is the ORIGINAL Thecla who is prophesied to sit on the throne -- which she does, twice. Once as the khaibit maid and once as Thecla. And the Thecla line is always envied by the Thea line for that.

San Pedro, The issue of natural birth of course a discomfirmation. It would be best if the we had evidence that that exultants were born just like like Typhon. But it isn't a disqualifier. It only means that the clone twins are implanted rather than grown. I still think the clone theory is the best way to resolve the elevation mystery. But it is disappointing that it requires this additional hurdle to gain acceptance.

With regard to Baldanders, I will copy-past I reddit post I made a couple of months ago: ""I hinted at my interpretation in my post about Theory of Omega Point, but I will repeat it here. I wanted to make in the future a well argued post with quotes with my theory, but what the hell xD One option is, as it has been already said, that they are gills, and i think that this reading is indeed 100% valid at some level of interpretation. But I think there is another relevant reading, in a deeper level of meaning. It is related to the Baldanders-megatherians-hierogrammates continuum as forever growing creatures. Those are surgical scars from a brain transplant. Baldanders, according to Borges' book of imaginary beings (from where we know Wolfe draw inspiration) means ever changing (soon to be another) . Baldanders brain (and thus himself) has been being transplanted from host to host for three lifetimes (literally xD) . His current body is at the end of its useful life, already made from parts of many donors due to reparation needs, frankenstein-like (Talos hints at this, when he says the prisoners in the lower levels of the castle are for this purpose). That is the reason why He has a giant baby in his tower (the one dropped in one of the plays by an spectator, btw, as Talos mentions). He is no pedophile at all! That would be completely out of character! He is not interested in sex at all. That baby would have been his future body-host if Severian hadn't forced him to run away underwater. And that is the ultimate reason why he needs a Doctor, because he needs an external agent to perform the surgery on him.""

With regard to Severian failing to recognize the maid at St. Katherine as a Thecla/Thea clone. I think it is easier than assuming (as you put forward) that Katherine as some make up on (specially having into account that the main problem is with the eye colour, which is dark in Katherine and purple in Thecla/Thea). As I have mentioned, I think it is related to the cosmetic treatments you receive as exultant, that maybe Katherine didn't receive. Jolenta has purple eyes after the treatment. So does mysterious Hethor's paracoita and sexual doll (a connection I don’t want todigress about here, just say for the time being that we purple eyes are equal to cosmetic surgery, as should plainly evident.. The Exultant women probably undergo these same cosmetic modifications. In fact, there is a lot of talk about musk and pheromones that arise sexual desire among men (as explained by Merry, explicitly said in relation to Jolenta, probably in relation to Agia [to account for that unexplainable sexual desire that comes from nowhere as it is insisted upon]). That might be the reason why fake Thecla is said, paradoxiacally, to smell stronger indeed than true Thecla (as Jolenta beauty vanishes, so does up to a certain point that of Thecla in prison? When she cannot access her perfume). I feel that stuff about cosmetic surgery is being used by Wolfe to obscure this relationships you have broguht up between the Khaibits of Katherine, in order to: 1-not being to obvious with the reader 2-(and much more important), justify in plot terms that Severian does not realize this connections when facing all these characters (I think understanding this point is KEY).

With regard to the reason why the Exultants are of higher stature. I think It is indeed necessary to accept both hypothesis: -that they are congenitally/genetically taller [nature] (otherwise, their children that don’t undergo any special kind of treatment wouldn’t be taller, as is the case with those raised among the torturers Severian included). This one is 100% certain according to the textual evidence, I would say. -that this genetic potential is powered by khaibits-tech and other means (otherwise, fake Thecla and Thea would be of similar height to their mains). This one I think depends on assuming that the girls in the House Azure are indeed khaibits and not some random girls with cosmetic surgery, so I wouldn’t say it is 100% sure as the one mentioned above. Nonetheless I think it is heavily implied in the text as you have pointed out and I agree. I buy it. I buy both.

Pag.85:I:X: [Severian says to Thecla] “I know little of the court, Chatelaine.” “The less you know, the happier you will be.” She paused, white teeth nibbling her delicately curved lower lip. “When my mother was in labor, she had the servants carry her to the Vatic Fountain, whose virtue is to reveal what is to come. It prophesied I should sit a throne. Thea has always envied me that. Still, the Autarch …” Whenever I have tried to explore the exultant khaibit/clones theory (e.k/cT) I have stumbled into this piece of text. Nonetheless, I still hope to make the (e.k/cT) viable and compatible with the textual evidence, because I find the concept really compelling in many ways (and It is also true that there are plenty of clues pointing towards this interpretation). However, the passage above is really disturbing… If GW had the (e.k/cT) in mind… What is the purpose of writing this passage this way? It seems to contradict (e.k/cT) without apparent reason to do so. Why didn’t he omitted it? OK, because he wanted to talk about the future foreseen by the Vatic Fountain for Thecla (which comes true in an unexpected way). But why didn’t he write it in another way? Something along the lines of “when I was born I was brought to the Vatic Fountain… But he specifically says LABOR! I think the solution is provided in further work (as is the case with many other things GW felt were too obscure in tBotNS to figure out based on tBotNS alone). Specifically in Long Sun, where we are told about Mucor and how different embryos can be implanted in a surrogate mother (in the same way it happens in real life, but with clones). So the solution to this little enigma resides in considering that khaibiting/cloning is not done in some kind of industrial way but implanting the embryo in a human woman (at least with regard to the leading clone in the flock, the main clone, the heir and “first-born”).There is no reason to think that the surrogate mother cannot be also the genetic donor. In fact, that would be by far the EASIEST way to undertake cloning in real life (I say it as a Medical Doctor). This is the way it was carried out in the case Dolly the sheep. Designing an artificial womb is way more complicated. Nonetheless, I can’t help thinking that GW stepped out of the (e.k/cT) plan (which in my opinion is definitely happening) for some obscure reason when writing this passage. And I can’t grasp the reason for this. I feel it is pointing toward something.

Why Severian does not recognize his mother's face in False Theca's is a problem. I suppose the easiest answer is that given the Maid's regular participation in the ceremony, and the importance of Thecla/Thea, she wore some degree of disguising make-up that did not complete hide things like facial expressions that Severian detected when he said that her face was like a pool of water.

> "this points to Valeria being a very ancient character maintained by cloning since very ancient times. " I think Severian's sister shows up multiple unexpected places. I'm not adverse at all to this theory if I can come up with a story I find plausible that explains why they did that. I still think those tunnels are used for Time Travel. I think that is the most credible explanation and I think it fits with the St Gildas legend that Catherine used those tunnels to participate in the Guild's ceremony. As for your theories as to why Severian comes back for Valeria, I'm not sure. Perhaps I'll eventually settle on one or all of them. I think Ive learned a lot about Valeria in this read, but she's only become a greater mystery for me. -- James

> "I want to highlight that this very argument also applies to Contessa Carina. " In the play, the Contessa arrives with her "maid". I should say that I don't believe the play necessarily describes Severian's own birth. It probably describes events most closely related to the First Severian's life. But it might reflect larger events. > "Thecla explicitly says that she was given birth by her mother in a natural way." Does she say this? Interesting. What is the text? > "I think exultants are genetically taller because they are of martian origin." It is clear they are generally taller. Severian who is half exultant (I say) is taller than average. But I think the massively greater height is induced.

Wonderful, wonderful! I have been playing with the idea of Thecla being related to Severian’s mother in some way for a long time now. I always found the idea compelling, because Severian would be his own father (classical scifi paradox). It fits with what we know about Severian’s mother (killed by the torturers). She might get pregnant of Severian after their intercourse. Her imprisonment and suspicious oblivion in that oubliette despite being such an important person would have been completely premeditated to make this happen. This would make Severian also “the increate” and the Father and Son of trinity in a very literal, twisted, sci-fi way. (It relates to a theory I have of Severian’s family tree I want to write about hopefully soon). And you brought up some very good textual pieces of evidences and established some connections I had missed completely: 1- I had never established the connection between the perfume Severian smells when drunk right after his elevation and that of fake Thecla. It is really easy to picture a proud mother staring at his sleeping son after a very important and challenging day of his life. I have a problem with this vision though. I like to think that the maid (Katherine, Severian’s mother) is really beheaded during the ceremony, as the Agilus’ execution chapter seems to imply. Why? This way, the story is much more deep and tragic. That was the final torture decreed on Katherine. To be killed by your own son, just after watching his accelerated growth and coming of age in a day, but in a twisted way: as a monster (a torturer). You wanted a son when you shouldn’t have had one? Ok, He will live, because it is not his fault to have neem conceived under such circumstances, but you will be forced to watch How he is brought up a monster, and then, when your torture is completed, he himself will end your life. Perfect, beautiful, flawless justice, imho. 2- The name connection pointing toward Thecla and Thea being “extracted” from Katherina, both as names and as beings. Marvelous. How is it possible I have failed to notice it before. I want to highlight that this very argument also applies to Contessa Carina. This Carina seems to reproduce the scene where Thecla is imprisoned and took away from the house absolute (this passage seems to happen peri-flood but we have to take into account that at that moment Severian is travelling through the space/time structure that is the house absolute, so could have happened anytime). Severian doesn’t recognize her, though. She might be indeed Katherina the maid and Severian’s mother, but… Why doesn’t he recognize her? He says she seems familiar (maybe clones are not equal, as is the case with Thea and Thecla and fake Thecla depending on external factors, though genetically identical). Or they are clones of different age. (I will expand on this) After all the praises (that your theory deserves) some objections and thoughts (I hope you can solve, because I want to see this theory or a version of it working). 1- Shouldn’t Severian note that beheaded maid Katherina and Thecla/Thea be of equal appearance? (To be honest, at first I considered it an objection but thinking of it I think It could be easily solved by the cosmetic treatments and modifications that exultants undergone, which can change your eye colour). 2- Thecla explicitly says that she was given birth by her mother in a natural way. Is (like in Long Sun) an embryo implanted in a real mother? Maybe. Or maybe they are born the usual way and then get cloned (khaibited), being the clones always the subordinates. Nonetheless, Valeria’s statement “I am all the children we breed” and fake Thecla’s statement “I could have been your Thecla” seem to heavily imply it is a random choice among a flock of clones/khaibits. One of them is chosen randomly to fulfill the leading role, and the other ones to fulfill subordinate roles (organ transplants like in The Island, hostages in the lake of Orchids, blood donors ). [digression: I think exultants are genetically taller because they are of martian origin. They are the conqueror class who came along with Typhon, in the same way the greeks became the satrap tyrannical ruling class of the helenistic empire of Alexander the Great, or the Goths the feudal lords and kings of the middle ages. NONETHELESS I think blood transfusions are also happening. They are used by the exultants yomaintain their differential physical characteristics of status inevitably devolving in Urth [pure Lamarckian de-evolution], in the same way in the middle ages pale skin, high stature and “blue” blood was desiderable and a sign of nobility. Blue blood, high stature, and pale skin were the physical characteristics of the northern barbarians who conquered the fallen roman empire (the blood appears blue in the veins under pale skin). They were also the product of not working under the sun in the fields and a good feeding no accessible to the populace] In fact this points to Valeria being a very ancient character maintained by cloning since very ancient times. Like Cleon in the new Foundation series on AppleTv. Their family only having money to afford one clone, herself. She is her mother, and her grand-mother, and her grand-grand-mother. It is only Valeria all the time. The nurse that takes care of her a robot, probably. I prefer thinking that in the atrium (waiting room) of time, time itself waits (stops), but this is another possibility. In any way it should be noted that Severian choosing Valeria is not random at all. It has to be prompted by Severian’s new memories as Autarch. The fact that Valerian has been waiting (either by cloning or literally waiting in an atemporal structure) to flee with the autarch of his era has to be related to Severian. Was She the bride of Ymar? (before Urth I thought that Ymar was Severian travelling back in time, and thus that would be a re-encounter , when Severian remembers after gaining Ymar memories his long lost love). Was She the bride (an Orchid) of autarch (minus a) Typhon? It seems textually more plausible (because of minus a autarch usage), but then I can’t figure why is She important. P:D: I have many more things to say but I have forcibly to stop here. I will come back here when I can. P.D: wonderful again!


More Creators