PATREON EXCLUSIVE (Full Video): Women must choose reality
Added 2024-05-14 05:00:02 +0000 UTC
Comments
Simply put, women exhaust me. Which is fine, since I quit dating 10 years ago. But even my sibling sisters sometimes exhaust me. They often seem to not wanna be confused with facts, but instead simply wanna believe what's most comfortable for them. Like most of the women I quit dating.
Roger Hayden
2024-05-26 17:27:04 +0000 UTC@E C - One last thing, you asked "Imagine if AG was talking down to men, would you watch him?" Strange that you should ask this question PRECISELY in the comment section of THIS video, given that it EXPLICITY featured this short: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/BTMUZEszw6o PS. Interestingly, Alexander's brand new posting JUST TODAY delves more into the reasons for his "tone". Perhaps we can continue this specific topic there.
Joseph Omega
2024-05-22 00:45:43 +0000 UTCGood points!
RhodiumMaiden
2024-05-20 13:42:39 +0000 UTCPersonally, I would tend to more generally phrase it as "'pick me's' are NOT inherently destructive (to femininity) while 'simps' ARE inherently destructive (to masculinity)". Though I could still envision extreme cases of ABUSE by the former (conscious self-centered deceptions, e.g. "gold diggers") and EXCEPTIONS to the latter (in the context of "mutual simping", e.g. "Romeo and Juliet"), I too see the underlying truths that threaten modern society.
Joseph Omega
2024-05-20 01:51:46 +0000 UTCπ― It is natural & appealing for women to praise & submit to men, & generally it means leaning into femininity. Whereas simps are fundamentally lacking in masculinity & no one mentally stable likes that - we should all be naturally repelled by that. You could also argue that βpick mesβ are constructive while simps are destructive. The former want healthy relationships with men, the latter contribute to societyβs downfall (see OnlyFans).
RhodiumMaiden
2024-05-19 17:43:27 +0000 UTCYeah when you mix modern family law and money with this ... Damn right men are very afraid and worried about a confident/delusion woman. Like I heard this stories time and again. A chick who was figuring out herself and in the end walked away with half of dudes $$$.
Louis
2024-05-19 02:11:01 +0000 UTCMany women treat confidence as an emotional state of being instead of an emotional state that is the end result of being competent through trial and error. Confidence isn't an emotional state that simply manifests; it's a state that's achieved through learning, experience, and mastery. Irrationally confident women are at best terrible actors since they refuse to put in the work.
Eric Andreas
2024-05-18 00:24:28 +0000 UTC@E C - It could be that I'm a little too new to the genre, but what are the "standards" that these Red Pill content creators want women to lower? Is it the lowering of the "hypergamy gap" where 90% of women will only pursue and settle for the top 10% of available men based on the notorious 6-6-6 criteria? Is it the degree of resiliance required during the "sickness" swing of the "in sickness and in health" component of the marriage vows explaining why women initiate divorce at a 75-80% rate? Or is it something else? But isn't "Feminism's" official goal for "both genders to win"? By any other name, militant activism scarcely produces other than a "zero-sum game". Can both genders win in the climate of the assumption of a "historically oppressive patriarchy that needs to be overthrown"? A 70-80% approval rate seems high, but I would be curious to learn the nature of the 20-30% that you disagree with, should you be willing to share. Alexander is the only PERSON I support on Patreon--I take it there are FEMALE content creators you support? Are they in "Red Pill" (or gender relations) space as well? It certainly is possible that this 80 year old man is STILL in possession of enough of his resources and money to attract a "nurse" with or without a "purse". After all, men that still possess their full faculties at that age are not normally known to be COMPLETELY naive of the ways of the world and how this game is played. With sufficient resources and money, I suspect that there would be MANY a "gold-digger" lining up to inherit any remaining fortune he may yet possess--he need not restrict himself to "older women". But if he IS broke, then his prospects indeed appear slim, regardless of age. A "kind soft-spoken feminist" seems like such a contradiction these days! Still, would Jessica Alba be described as an "activist"? Does she believe in a "historically oppressive patriarchy that needs to be overthrown"? She certainly strikes me as "feminine" (along with Marilyn Monroe), but I may not be able to trust my hormones with such an objective assessment in either case. π But I think I DO understand why you may be driven to judge "femininity" to include "kindness to women"--the feminine archetype ostensibly tends to encompasses kindness to ALL creatures. However (as you seem to have guessed) men don't really care that much, as long as a woman brings peace and support to a man and his surroundings (his "island" as Alexander would say), her treatment of other women is of much lesser importance. Just red pill truth. I can also see how you would think that "pick me girls" may not be kind to other women, and that you would conclude they have "deep rooted misogyny", but again, MOST MODERN MEN DON'T REALLY CARE. Maybe in the pre-misandric past (where chivalry reigned) things may have been different, but "official" modern Feminism is a victim of its own success (in demonizing the "patriarchy"). Men consider women who are kind to them but unkind to (or "blunt" with) women as "allies" (to use a well-worn "wokism"), and another vehicle to help reverse the modern "Feminist Narrative". In addition, men often see the unpredictability and stream-of-consciousness (and even occasionally shrill) communication style of such women as a "kind of de-facto femininity", par for the course. As one of those you would call "pick me" described: "Feminine rage". There is also the idea that the VAST majority of females will NOT be swayed to even CONSIDER red pill content as having ANY merit whatsoever when presented with "kindness to women". Such is the steep incline of female victimization and "oppressive patriarchy" of indoctrination to be overcome. I take it you disagree?
Joseph Omega
2024-05-17 05:25:50 +0000 UTCEnjoying your argument/discussion. You both bring up good points. Itβs also nice to see two people who can actually use proper sentence structure and punctuation. Donβt see that much here on the internet. I can actually understand and follow.
Eric Linden
2024-05-17 05:08:05 +0000 UTCIsn't Feminism all about "female empowerment" and hence "backbone" (a.k.a. "girl power") and "standards" (a.k.a. "hypergamy")? What it is NOT about is "accountability". I disagree with Alexander only rarely, that is why I'm on his paid Patreon. PS. Why would women have a problem with "simps" though? Don't they cater to the female ego? I suspect the reason no one likes "simps" is because they are inconsistent with MASCULINITY, and the reason why men have no problem with "pick me's" is because they are NOT inconsistent with FEMININITY. Why women DETEST "pick me's" would be a matter of speculation.
Joseph Omega
2024-05-16 20:29:08 +0000 UTCTrue, you have your opinion, and I have mine. Still, certainly you can't argue that not every woman who criticizes other women is a "pick me", just as not every man who supports a woman is a "simp". You will find few here who dissagree with this, or would care to immediately call this first girl a "pick me" (including Alexander). It is the nature of "red pill content" and this forum. As I said earlier somewhere, it really doesn't matter to me if she and other women are "pick me" or not, as long as what they say consistently counters the relentless Feminist narrative of female victimization and an "oppressive patriarchy". Misandry is the dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against men. As a widespread phenomenon, I think it was first spawned as a movement at least during the 1960's when bras were burned and female promiscuity was a sign of "sexual freedom" and "empowerment". Although throughout history there had always been a long standing simmering fear and distrust by men and women of each other, it was only recently that "man hating" was codified and legitimized within the culture. Modern mysogyny in contrast (as exemplified by the "Incel" and "MGTOW" movements) are essentially REACTIONARY in nature in response to the prevailing and relentless misandric narrative. Another noteworthy aspect of things is that "simps" are universally held in VERY low regard by males AND females alike, whereas "pick me's" are really only dispised by women--the vast majority of men have no problem with "Stepford Wives", yet women go BALLISTIC at the very idea. Make of that what you will.
Joseph Omega
2024-05-16 18:04:06 +0000 UTCThe Dunning-Kruger Effect is real.
Matt Scoggins
2024-05-16 16:47:51 +0000 UTCAny woman who calls the first girl a "pick me" just for pointing out the blatantly obvious or who thinks there are many men who think themselves the prize are just giving in to their insecurities or just being reactionary. And to think that because she rates herself a 6.5 while THEY think that she is a 7 (only 0.5 higher!) just betrays their underlying misandry
Joseph Omega
2024-05-16 10:41:27 +0000 UTCThank you for sharing how my initial statement made you feel. I understand that it would seem very weak and unattractive to women for a man to say that. It proves my point actually. Acknowledgement of any weakness is unattractive even if outside of his control. (a man being a victim gives women the ick) The acceptable frame would be: well some men are more attractive but it doesn't matter to me, I'm getting better at all times. That's key right. As a man, to exude strength and confidence. Because what do women want? They want better.
Steven
2024-05-16 06:25:27 +0000 UTCHe is kinda talking to men. But he speaks to women too(how to get ANY man you have access to). And he explains how things are percieved by a woman but in the end he is talking to men. And in 5 βin or lessβ¦ you cant address all the nuances of both sides. Its for men. The meat of the situation. No salad. Just meat. And the point was the perception of disrespect / respect and what even constitutes it us so different The video in question is really good The take away is. Nen should not respect women without reason. Respect for a man means looking up to. Ue pedistalise a women for not reason of the bat. But inversly men ahould not DESRESPECT a woman fir no reason. The way women desrpect men is so spor on its ine of my fav orion vids. Every guy knows these. How you speak to a boss or father As a guy you know the reaction to cheek aka challenging uim and the deference of their status that follows But women get away with murder in that regard. They do this like as for explanation or justification. That already is desrespect. Who are you to require these things. Its putting yourself atleast on equal footing. Infact its putting yourself above them as THEY beed to answer YOU. You control if things proceed. Its a super good video I think women would be shocked by it. And probably despute it. But i can tell you. Its pretty right.
Peter
2024-05-16 05:38:26 +0000 UTCI saw the desrispect and deference video. Its really good and spot on
Peter
2024-05-16 05:27:25 +0000 UTCConfidence and arrogance are basically the same thing. Itβs a perception thing.
Eric Linden
2024-05-15 22:27:44 +0000 UTCRegarding women who display traits otherwise labeled as masculine, such as confidence, ambition, bravery, etc., the problem is not in those traits themselves. Quite a sizeable population of men including myself view these as positives. More so, positive masculinity is fine but what's truly a problem is things devolving into a power struggle and the woman disrespecting the man. These are the things relatively masculine women must avoid to have a healthy relationship. To this end, I have a few words for those strong and independent women: Orion Taraban's channel, "PsychHacks", has a good series on the topic of women disrespecting men in terms of how they knowingly or unknowingly do it and how to avoid it. So, I won't try to reinvent the wheel here. On the topic of power struggles, know that you don't need to triumph over someone to prove your self-worth despite feminism telling you that you've been oppressed and now have a chip on your shoulder. Live up to your standards for your satisfaction.
Ashwin Srinivas
2024-05-15 16:08:21 +0000 UTCNot actually a question. What I mean is that by being more attractive you are likely to feel confident as the people around you respond, even subconsciously in more positive ways towards you (halo effect). The perhaps more superficial qualities prized amongst a majority in the current social landscape can be largely unearned (including arrogance) which is the problem I personally feel towards it. I believe we could aim for a higher ideal or concept of personal value but base human nature is not easily directed like that. Why do you think it is a feminine thing to say?
Steven
2024-05-15 06:10:05 +0000 UTCI agree but not fully. I think you can bluff confidence. Value and social status are perceived and not completely objective. Attractiveness is comparatively objective so when women claim they are 10s they are delusional. If a mediocre person enters a social interaction with very high confidence, one they increase their perceived value, but two they essentially create value by creating an exciting and positive emotional environment. Confidence with women is also a catch 22. To attract women you need experience, but to have experience you must have previously attracted women. In this situation, one has to bluff. Sure, you might have a grounding for your confidence based on other factors in your life, but you still bluff to a degree.
Thomas Owen
2024-05-14 23:07:09 +0000 UTCSo if you're more attractive you're essentially entitled to more confidence. Game's fucked.
Steven
2024-05-14 12:34:26 +0000 UTCMark - was meant as a tongue in cheek comment, thus the not serious comment in rackets after.
Anthony White
2024-05-14 12:23:19 +0000 UTCSometimes, we project ourselves onto women. In my opinion, it is men who must choose reality. The previous video on Hoeflation identifies the reality of a bubble. The smart thing in this situation is to wait for the bubble to burst. The bubble will burst when people (men and women) realize they are victims of their own denial. I believe we are seeing the start of it on social media. Men are realizing they are better off choosing patience in place of chasing Tinderella. Women are crying about not getting what they want. They keep crying about how their horse drawn carriages keep turning into pumpkins. Remember the video of the women who chose to walk home because neither she or her date was willing to pay for the Uber? That was a pumpkin moment. I have seen people in 12 step recovery groups go through the process of picking themselves up off the floor after they realize they have become victims of their own denial. The transformation is fascinating to watch.
Mark Bryski
2024-05-14 10:20:54 +0000 UTCThis rant matched your nick splendidly xD I overall agree, but there are plenty of normal women. At the end of the day, it is a personal choice.
Cezary Skoczek
2024-05-14 10:17:41 +0000 UTCShe is 7 to me as well. She has an above-average face, although she has way too much makeup xD Yet she says she is 6,5 "to appear humble" which women below her looks would find furious ;)
Cezary Skoczek
2024-05-14 10:15:23 +0000 UTCShe is a 7 to me as far as attractiveness goes. Her lack of delusion/confidence gives her an extra point or two. Maybe that is what youβre seeing.
Eric Linden
2024-05-14 09:58:09 +0000 UTC"Women must choose reality" - you can't have met any! (not serious comment)
Anthony White
2024-05-14 09:57:33 +0000 UTCThere is always a price to pay when you go against "the hive".
Mark Bryski
2024-05-14 09:08:32 +0000 UTCThe first part was entertaining. It is also important to acknowledge the existence of these types of women and just how prevalent they are because we encounter them on a daily basis. The end of the video was helpful. Simple but effective tips on how to build rapport and learn about the woman, all while maintaining your frame. Frankly speaking, as men, we may be inviting or creating a vacuum for shit tests because we are not maintaining our frame.
Mark Bryski
2024-05-14 08:50:42 +0000 UTCFrom not being held accountable for anything, getting a trophy for breathing, getting compliments from random strangers all day for simply having a punani, getting undeserved special treatments as a result of pretty privilege, being pedestalized by simpletons around the globe, receiving affirmation on social media from other equally clueless women egging each another on, and so forth, there is little surprise that many young modern women live in an iron bubble of delusion so well fortified that not even Israel's Iron Dome air defense system can't hold a candle to it. The worst part is that there is a never ending hoard of thirsty men willing to supply their misdirected time and attention to feed their delusion. Admittedly, I blame the men more on this.
Hyperion
2024-05-14 07:11:39 +0000 UTCI can bet a Benjamin Franklin that the lady from the first TikTok has a comment section full of accusations of being a pick-me girl xD I'm not saying she is, as my impression is that she has high standards. But she isn't just 6,5 and women will try to tear her up.
Cezary Skoczek
2024-05-14 05:54:34 +0000 UTCBesides the overuse of the word βliterallyβ, the woman at the start makes me happy to be single again :) That said, rating ourselves and others in a scale from 1 to 10 can be useful, as long as we can receive and accept sincere feedback, and use different ratings for different areas of oneself. I am a 7/10 when it comes to financial management of an organisation, but definitely a 4/10 at managing my own finances. Rating your own looks and confidence (especially as confidence is very much domain dependent) can be a hard question to answer. Thanks for the upload frequency and quality, Alex! Always excited to receive the notification of a new video :)
vanidotau
2024-05-14 05:34:19 +0000 UTC
