It's Official: UFOs Are Real - The Report!!!!

I was pleasantly surprised by the report.

Fran, you do you. I can't say I find any of your content offensive, and if other people do, that's on them.

Brendan Meteer

It’s your channel to do with as you wish. No one has the right to tell you what to do. Our rights end where your nose begins. Keep on thinking free.

Okay - for those who are upset about my video let me say that my channel is about my exploring what interests me, and this interests me. That's it.

Fran Blanche

It was truly complete happenstance. I had the shirt on when I read the report was out, and I just decided to leave it on! Seemed appropriate.

Fran Blanche

LIghten up, Andreas. I think all would agree that Fran delivers more of what you want than most. Besides, the interesting aspect of her videos is always her own passion and interest in whatever topic she's on. Frankly, I think she went out of her way to dispel loon talk. I was glad to get her take on the report. Thanks, Fran!

Please stop this UFO stop or oen another channel. I came here for vintage electronics, not for arguments with tfh loons.

Andreas Dorfer

Thank you Fran for reading the report rather than reporting on the report. But thank you for wearing your ELO T-shirt because I just love ELO and it gives me one more reason to love you.

Mike Hughes , And maybe pigs have wings. Stick to what we know.

Bruce Havourd

Dr Andy Hill , Give her a friggin' break.

Bruce Havourd

An informative example how a "UFO" category can lose its "U" is the history of "ball lightning". Search results include some extremely witty and highly informative articles, with interesting aspects on the social and scientific dimensions of how difficult it can be for perspectives to change or become more nuanced.

BobC

Maybe they are attempting to nuture the fact in the general public gently, that ufo's are a thing,so as to avoid mass hysteria .

Mike Hughes

I hope you channel doesn't go all uncontrollable again after publishing this video.

Dr Andy Hill

Yes I agree with what it says in the report about visits from other world's, if people who doubt it read between the lines they will realize that we are being scrutinized all the time by aliens who maybe some are just curious and some maybe mapping us out with the intention of someday getting a huge force together to take over our planet, anyway I've known about visiting UFOs since I was a kid, from time to time out in my back garden I use to see a big object in the sky,it would just sit there above me then dart about from one position to another, people need to believe in other existences, if we can go out into space so can they ,we are not alone,our world and space is very complicated and couldn't all have happened just by chance, there is supreme intelligence out there and they know all about us, well happy hunting Fran, keep up the very interesting work,bye for now, regards Cindy

Very interesting indeed!

Could we get back to electronics of this world please. Nothing in that report says aliens from another planet. Next....

Leigh

Well, this is exactly what I expected. Confirmation of the phenomena and the need for specialized sensor pods to be affixed to Navy aircraft to obtain better data. It's exactly what I wrote when you first presented us with the 60 minutes videos. It even mentioned the disruption to expensive Naval training exercises when these distractions appear. Yes, it's a call for dollars, but if we really, truly want better data we're going to have to construct a broadband sensor suite that can collect better images/data on these UFOs. As the report said, the targeting/surveillance systems on modern military aircraft are designed to look specifically at man-made targets that we can engage if we chose to. It's just lucky that these UFOs happen to fall into the sensor range of modern military systems to the point where they can actually be tracked, at least for a while. There is no doubt that this watered-down "unclassified" report omits the true cutting-edge technology we employ to find and track even the smallest targets. I understand we don't want to disclose our best surveillance technology to the world, but it would have been nice to allude to the existence of them and if they produced better data and pictures. No matter what security clearance I may have, it was made clear from the beginning that at any level, "Need to know" is the very first rule in accessing sensitive information. I understand National Security and I know I don't have that "need to know" for anything I am not actively working on. But I sure wish I did have access to the redacted data that didn't make it into the publicly released version. So I still stand by my original recommendation to build advanced sensor pods to really look at these UFOs. But if what they collect is deemed "classified", then we're still stuck blindfolded in the dark. This is so frustrating!

Matt Wietlispach

Hot off the presses ! 💪😃😉