I Deleted All My Andrew Tate Videos From YouTube (Am Archiving Them Here On Patreon)
Added 2024-02-02 03:00:04 +0000 UTCI hated these videos, I regret making them. I explained why here: https://www.patreon.com/posts/76267315
YouTube is cracking down on content that features this guy so I've deleted the videos. I'm archiving them here on Patreon for anyone curious about my thoughts about this guy.
Andrew Tate is right about men being too feminine - https://youtu.be/wr5DZWw0Qa8
Andrew Tate is wrong about men’s mental health - https://youtu.be/rCiZ17fZasM
Andrew Tate is right about women’s dating choices - https://youtu.be/6y1blDwaHbY
Andrew Tate is wrong about taking responsibility - https://youtu.be/7h4DYAR2kEw
Andrew Tate is right about disrespectful women - https://youtu.be/eDZqAKMpxGQ
Andrew Tate is wrong about fatherhood - https://youtu.be/o-rwu-eKKIo
Andrew Tate is right about traditional gender roles - https://youtu.be/ZxtV6QpX8vU
Comments
Choose your heroes wisely, and be careful whom you idolize. Pay attention to the person whom one idolizes, for it is a confession of one's character. There is never a lack of good, strong, masculine role models for men; history is replete with them. Then again, it's no surprise that many young men gravitate toward a flamboyant man-child like Andrew Tate and mistaken that for strength and success, because they don't study history ... or even read for that matter. What I consider most dire is the role models --or lack thereof-- of modern young women. Is there any wonder women turned out the way they do given whom they idolize, namely the likes of the Kardashians?
Hyperion
2024-02-08 05:29:34 +0000 UTCExactly
Eschalec Art
2024-02-04 22:54:27 +0000 UTCAlexander was quite spot on in his discussion of feminism in those videos, and I’m grateful he made them for that reason.
Eschalec Art
2024-02-04 22:47:12 +0000 UTCThere are many female CC that I feel exactly this way about. So, yes.
Kent C Johnson
2024-02-03 18:25:02 +0000 UTCTate is a trashy, selfish, manipulative grifter but you’re mostly right about the Convid scamdemic & jabs & woke censorship
RhodiumMaiden
2024-02-02 16:12:02 +0000 UTCYou talk of gullibility....show me evidence that Andrew Tate coerced these women. Not one shred of evidence has been produced which is why they could not convict him on the false charges. Talk about gullible. You seem to think that women that choose to show their body for money are not victims. You are the gullible young man you speak about. If people had their values and their morals screwed in right, noone would be making any money this way. AT was just not greasing the palms of the people in power. Stop you're simping for women that play victim to their own immorality. I do not worship AT or AG... I am sick of the hypocrisy of people like you. I do my own thinking, I didn't "fall for" any disinformation. I actually used my own brain and came up with the obvious. Sounds like you "fell for" the disinformation. Everyone should do their own research and all should have a say on all platforms so that we can discuss the merits of that information. I bet you believe in manmade climate change too because you were told it was true, not because you actually looked at ALL the data, not just the data that has been spoonfed to you by even bigger grifters than Andrew Tate.
William ONeil
2024-02-02 15:40:07 +0000 UTCI think you completely misunerstand the concept of consent. Do you not see a difference between a woman opening an onlyfans and taking her own photos from the comfort of her own home, and being coerset into sex work by other people? Andrew Tate is accused of sexual trafficking. Do you not understand that these women might be forced to do this kind of work under the implication that they might face consqeuences if they don't? Until he is proven innocent in court, I think his presence online needs to be limited. I don't necessarily with deplatforming someone, especially for content that only mentions that person but Andrew Tate is a danger to young gullible men who are starved for a role model. He exploits his viewers for money through projects like Hustler's university, he spreads misinformation about health care and vaccines which you clearly fell for. Andrew Tate is a genuine danger to society and people's physical health through gullible people such as yourself. By talking about him we only generate him more online engagement and make him more money. Hell, he probably likes getting deplatformed, it probably gives him more attention which he can monetise later. I appreciate Alexander's videos about him because they shows that even the most vile human can say something right here and there, no matter how misguided his other opinions are, but the videos were made long before his imprisonment in Romania and before the more severe accusations came out. I do not blame Alexander for taking the videos down, in the end it is his family's source of income and I would have done the same.
Tenkos
2024-02-02 15:25:45 +0000 UTCAs someone who teaches clear thinking skills perhaps this can help: We can make an analogy here to Jordan Peterson. Jordan's presentation is awful and he often creates more confusion than he dissolves. YouTube is full of videos pointing this out. To me his speaking is "fingernails on a chalkboard" like it might be to an English teacher hearing bad English. But here's the deal, EVERYTHING Jordan says can be heard from many other people who are fantastic communicators without the noise that we have to spend energy clearing out from what Jordan says. So Jordan Peterson can be SKIPPED as a source of knowledge and insight. We can get way better value from others. Same with Andrew Tate. We're here because we get excellent value from Alexander Grace who is consistent and displays intellectual and emotional integrity. Word. 😀
Markus Halvorson
2024-02-02 09:57:17 +0000 UTCI should think the Tate series, although a slight departure from your usual format, is produced with utmost care, reason, and thought as all your other content. It is by far the most rational and well articulated commentary on Andrew Tate that I've seen. For this reason alone, it is invaluable and necessary.
Hyperion
2024-02-02 09:34:15 +0000 UTCMr Grace I don't have any problem with you aggressively defending your decision. I have a great deal of respect for you and your content. This is why I have had the response that I have had. I just don't like seeing over and over again, the majority of humankind being controlled by a minority woke cult. Tell me what Andrew Tate did wrong.. He was accused of exploiting wonen. Did these women have no agency of their own? Most of them said they could come and go as they chose. As ONLY FANS proves, remove Andrew Tate from the equation women choose to do the exact same thing he accused of giving them a platform for. It can be seen as women's nature to exploit themselves. Where is the equivalent outrage that should be raining down on the owners of onlyfans. You could make the case that they are exploiting exponentially more women than AT could even dream of "exploiting". Yeah, I won't be holding my breath either. Jordan Peterson said that at least Andrew Tate chose "forthright aggression rather than cringing defeat" when he was arrested. You have asked whether I would put my money where my mouth is. I have done more than that during the so called pandemic that was caused by gain of function experimentation by my own government. I refused to take an experimental vaccine that did nothing to prevent transmission at great personal and professional cost. I refused to wear personal protective equipment that has been proven not to prevent the spread of that disease. I have also been refused medical care from an indoctrinated health care system that will not even discuss alternate methods of care, not because they don't work, but because it would not enrich the medical industrial complex or the pharmaceutical industry. Gain of function research has not been curtailed in spite of the pain and destruction it has caused. The same people that would deplatform you were the same people that removed people from discussing really important information that we needed during a "pandemic" that they allowed to happen that this time only killed ONE PERCENT of the population whether or not you took the vaccine closed your business down , wore a mask, isolated people from their dying relatives and friends.. They can easily release a virus that would kill 50% of the population. The bottom line Mr Grace is, you can run but you can't hide from the long arm of ideological administrative violence. I believe that people are getting sick and tired of being silenced. It will come to a head, you can choose to fight it now...or forced to fight it later in the streets.
William ONeil
2024-02-02 09:28:03 +0000 UTCAnd before you get too righteous judging me for not martyring myself for the cause of free speech, since you value people who put there money where their mouth is, if I didn't delete those videos and my channel was terminated as a result, are you willing to put your money where your mouth is and personally compensate me indefinitely for my lost income? I apologize if that comes off harshly, I'm trying to find a way to demonstrate that while in my heart of hearts I believe in free speech and don't support deplatforming, making a stand on this issue would cost me a lot more than it would cost you. I have never martyred myself before for any other figure who was deplatformed. I'm being completely consistent with all previous behaviour and I'm not going to make an exception in this case.
Alexander Grace
2024-02-02 08:11:41 +0000 UTCIt's as simple to me as following all YouTube guidelines for posting videos that risk having your channel terminated. You can see them here: https://www.youtube.com/intl/ALL_au/howyoutubeworks/policies/community-guidelines/ Plus I HATED those videos, I'm glad to be rid of them. I already explained why here: https://www.patreon.com/posts/76267315
Alexander Grace
2024-02-02 08:00:58 +0000 UTCMr. Grace, Please explain to me why you would be ashamed of making any video regarding the subject matter of Andrew Tate. Whether you agree or disagree with him, it sounds very much like you are succumbing to pressure by YouTube to denounce and silence any free speech on this subject, which would make you a very weak man, indeed. My continued support for your channel, however small, hinges on your answer. During covid we have seen the power of the state, and of large corporations, to silence discourse , and call people legitimately calling out the so called experts on their bullshit, conspiracy theorists to silence them. For the most part they have won because of weak kneed "Men" that bowed to their tactics. At least Andrew Tate put his money where his mouth is. He did not comply, right or wrong.
William ONeil
2024-02-02 06:43:58 +0000 UTCAnyone that doe's realize that Tate is and entertainer first and everything else second will never get the joke. None of this takes away from the largely positive impact that he has had. In a world utterly bereft of strong male role models, what do we expect?
Kent C Johnson
2024-02-02 04:05:56 +0000 UTCYou might hate them, but at the time it has been a good way for me to show my friends males and females my point view about family values, relationships and dating market. People nowadays think you either have to be a Tate fanboy or a blue pill guy, this was my way of showing that finding the good and bad in every point of view is the most precise way to face reality
Simone De Cao
2024-02-02 03:55:11 +0000 UTC
